3D micromixer for nanoliposome synthesis: a promising advance in high mass productivity.

This paper addresses an important breakthrough in the high mass production of liposomes by microfluidics technology. We investigated the synthesis of liposomes using a high flow rate microfluidic device (HFR-MD) with a 3D-twisted cross-sectional microchannel to favor chaotic advection. A simple construction scaffold technique was used to manufacture the HFR-MD. The synthesis of liposomes combined the effects of high flow and high concentration of lipids, resulting in high mass productivity (2.27 g of lipid per h) which, to our knowledge, has never been registered by only one microdevice. We assessed the effects of the flow rate ratio (FRR), total flow rate (TFR), and lipid concentration on the liposome physicochemical properties. HFR-MD liposomes were monodisperse (0.074) with a size around 100 nm under the condition of an FRR of 1 (50% v/v ethanol) and TFR of 5 ml min-1 (expandable to 10 ml min-1). We demonstrated that the mixing conditions are not the only parameter controlling liposome synthesis using experimental and computational fluid dynamics analysis. A vacuum concentrator was used for ethanol removal, and there is no further modification after processing in accordance with the structural (SAXS) and morphological (cryo-TEM) analysis. Hence, the HFR-MD can be used to prepare nanoliposomes. It emerges as an innovative tool with high mass production.

The effect of the volumetric flow rate and endotracheal tube diameter on the pressure distribution in human airways.

The comprehension of the fluid flow in the upper airways is of paramount importance when treating patients under clinical conditions that demand mechanical ventilation. Barotrauma and overdistension are related to undesirable pressures and might be responsible for morbidity and mortality. In the current work we use computational fluid dynamics to investigate the pressure field in the upper respiratory airways. We performed a set of simulations varying the volumetric flow rate of mechanical ventilators and we have shown that the pressure profile can be calculated by means of the volumetric flow rate in accordance with a mathematical expression given by Pav=aV˙2, where Pav is the average pressure at selected sections of the upper airways and V˙ is the volumetric flow rate. Numerical findings provide evidence that the constant a varies with the location of the plane in the upper airways. We also show that some particular diameters of endotracheal tubes (ETT) must be used with care for a given range of volumetric flow rates. Overall, we document an important relationship among pressure, volumetric flow rate and selected internal diameters from ETT.